The Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) has pushed back against claims circulating on social media following the arrest and release of private legal practitioner Martin Kpebu, insisting that its officers acted strictly within the law.
In a detailed internal brief shared with the media on Thursday, December 4, the OSP stated that Mr Kpebu’s behaviour at the entrance and within the compound “left officers with no option but to enforce the law,” emphasising that the arrest was based purely on obstruction of lawful duties.
According to the OSP, Mr Kpebu has developed “a pattern of unruly conduct” toward security officers, often accompanied by attempts to mislead the public after each encounter. The office maintained that his allegations of misconduct were unfounded.
“Mr Kpebu continues to present a distorted version of events after every incident. This is not new,” the OSP said.
The office also rejected assertions that its investigators were “junior officers,” clarifying that those handling the case hold ranks comparable to Deputy Commissioners of Police.
“It is misleading for anyone to suggest that the OSP is investigating itself. Fact-finding inquiries are standard across all law-enforcement institutions,” the statement added.
The OSP further explained that Mr Kpebu was cautioned after filming around the restricted premises, and his subsequent insults and threats triggered the arrest.
“His conduct was obstructive, abusive and unacceptable within any security installation,” the brief emphasised.
It also dismissed claims that Mr Kpebu was mishandled, insisting that there was “no use of force” and that bail was granted in line with procedure.
The office noted that he is expected to report again for further investigation into the obstruction charge, while a separate date will be set for the inquiry into his earlier allegations against the Special Prosecutor.
“The law applies to everyone equally. Media visibility or social influence does not place any individual above lawful procedures,” the OSP stressed.